introduction
The Supreme Court of the United States has made several rulings on affirmative action
, including a recent one in 2023 in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. In this case, the Court upheld the use of race as a factor in college admissions but placed new limits on how race can be considered. According to the Court, universities must have a compelling reason to use race as a factor and must do so in a narrowly tailored manner.
While the Court's decision in Fisher was seen as a victory for affirmative action advocates, it also left some questions unanswered. It remains unclear how the ruling will be applied in future cases, and it's possible that the Court may revisit the issue of affirmative action later on.
.
1.Here are some key Supreme Court cases on affirmative action:
- 1.Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978): The Court ruled that race could be considered in college admissions but banned the use of quotas.
- Grutter v. Bollinger (2003): The Court upheld the use of race as a factor in law school admissions.
- 2. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016): The Court upheld the use of race as a factor in college admissions but set new limits on its application.
- Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2023): The Court upheld the use of race as a factor in college admissions but also introduced new limitations on its use.
The Supreme Court's rulings on affirmative action have generated controversy, and there is no clear consensus on whether affirmative action is beneficial or detrimental. Supporters argue that it is necessary to address past racism and discrimination and promotes diversity and inclusivity. Opponents argue that it is unfair to give preferential treatment based on race or ethnicity and undermines the principle of equal opportunity.
The debate over affirmative action is likely to persist for
many years, and the Supreme Court's rulings will continue to shape this ongoing discussion.
2. California rejected affirmative action in 2020.
California voters rejected Proposition 16, a measure that would have repealed Proposition 209, which banned affirmative action in the state in 1996. Proposition 16 was defeated by a vote of 55% to 45%.
There were a number of reasons why Proposition 16 was defeated. Some voters opposed affirmative action on principle, believing that it is unfair to give preferential treatment to certain groups of people based on their race or ethnicity. Others were concerned that affirmative action would harm the educational opportunities of Asian Americans, who are already a highly successful group in California. Still others believed that affirmative action was no longer necessary, as California has become a more diverse state in recent years.
The defeat of Proposition 16 was a setback for supporters of affirmative action, but it is not the end of the fight. Affirmative action advocates are already planning to try again to overturn Proposition 209, perhaps in a future election when the political climate is more favorable.
Comments
Post a Comment